| 
Aging
Infrastructure Brings Economic Ramifications
September 1, 2004 @ 6:33 am and 8:20 am on 90.3
Compared
with the past two decades, 2003 was a boom year for infrastructure
investment in Greater Cleveland. Yet, despite this relative splurge,
large portions of the region’s infrastructure are aging and
need attention. Evidence is all around, some say: from last summer’s
blackout to widespread flooding this year. And, they say, aging
infrastructure has other, less visible ramifications for our economy
as well. In our on-going series Making
Change: Reinventing our Economy, ideastream’s
Shula Neuman has the report.


You probably
don’t have to think too hard to come up with the name of a
street that makes you fear for the well-being of your car. You know
the kind - cracks that rival the Grand Canyon, potholes that rattle
your ribs when you pass over them. Those charming features have
names. Ron Eckner, director of transportation planning at the Northeast
Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency can tick off several of them on
a single city block in downtown Cleveland.
Ron
Eckner: This is what it looks like - so it is fatigue
cracking. Very severe fatigue cracking is called alligator or chicken
wire.
That’s
when multiple cracks break up the pavement so it looks like... well...
alligator skin. There are also longitudinal and latitudinal cracks
and patches. When there are grooves in the pavement that cradle
your tires just so - that’s called rutting. And there’s
raveling which feels like a really rough road.
Ron
Eckner: And what has happened here
is the aggregate shows and the asphalt is gone. It’s really
hard to see when it’s dry, but if you look carefully you can
see the aggregate is kind of sticking up.
Eckner
says he can’t judge from just looking if the cause is skin
deep, or comes from the base. Either way, he says, fixing them isn’t
cheap.
Ron
Eckner: If it’s
really bad it’s probably got a bad base. So, putting three
inches of asphalt on a bad base won’t last very long. One
inch will last long enough for you to design a new roadway. But
that gets to be real expensive.
The federal government usually has a hand in funding those road repairs.
But that’s not the case for much of the infrastructure that
we don’t see. Drinking water, hazardous waste, energy and sewer
rely mostly on local user fees - fees that increase when maintenance
and improvements are necessary.
Erwin
Odeal: We’re looking at around $1.2 billion
in 30 years to have to invest in current infrastructure.
Erwin
Odeal is Executive Director of the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer
District.
Erwin
Odeal: We’re also looking at another $1.2
billion that will have to be invested in the combined sewer overflow
problem. The situation with the storm and sanitary in the same pipe
and it overflows in a rain storm. So we really are looking at 30
years capital needs of some $3.2 billion plus the cost of running
day to day operations of the business here.
The
kicker with the sewer district is that the EPA mandates many of
the improvements to the system, even though the federal government
doesn’t fund them. As a result, rates for the district’s
500,000+ customers will go up an average of $5 a month in the next
two years. Northeast Ohio isn’t alone in coping with aging
infrastructure. The American Society of Civil Engineers gives the
nation as a whole a D+ on infrastructure investments. ASCE executive
director Pat Natale says aging infrastructure is a threat to our
safety and our economy.
Pat
Natale: We need a healthy infrastructure to support
a healthy economy. Or to put it in other words, a crumbling infrastructure
cannot support a healthy economy.
It would
take at least $1.6 trillion to bring the nation’s infrastructure
up to top standards, Natale says. And he’s concerned because
it’s an issue that doesn’t seem to capture the public’s
imagination.
Pat
Natale: What will it take? Will it take another
blackout? Will it take a bridge failing? A dam failing? Or some
other catastrophe to get people’s attention? I’d hate
to have it get to that.
There’s
another reason it’s difficult to impress people with the importance
of maintaining infrastructure.
Hunter
Morrison: It’s not a real sexy topic.
That’s
what Hunter Morrison says - he’s director for the Center for
Urban and Regional Studies at Youngstown State University and the
former planning director for the city of Cleveland.
Hunter
Morrison: But it’s what under-girds a lot our ability
to live the lives we want to live and if we want to continue doing
that we need to focus our attention and debate on that.
Morrison says
without top-notch infrastructure, the region could lose its competitive
advantage. Northeast Ohio is currently a major hub for distribution
of goods now thanks to our efficient highway system, he says. But
it won’t stay that way without investing in upkeep. The problem,
according to Morrison, is that federal funding is based on population,
and while the region’s transportation needs are growing,
its population is not.
Hunter
Morrison: So
if we don’t have more people, and yet we have more roads
and bridges and sewer and water lines to service, we’re
spreading the peanut butter thinner and thinner on the bread.
One of the biggest challenges we face is how to meet the infrastructure
demands of the growing expanding portions of our region while
meeting the continuing system maintenance needs of existing communities.
There are no
easy solutions, Morrison says. We can hope for new funding formulas
or we could rethink the region’s development patterns. Or,
Morrison says, solving the infrastructure issue could be the starting
point for regional cooperation. In Cleveland, Shula Neuman, 90.3.
Resources:
|