 |

Race
and Regionalism - Kentucky Style
April 28, 2004 @ 6:33 am and 8:20 am on 90.3
In the
continuing quest to improve the economic well-being of Northeast
Ohio, regionalism is a concept that’s catching the imagination
of area leaders. Its meaning is vague, referring to anything from
inter-governmental cooperation to an actual merging of governments,
such as a city with a county. In this segment of Making
Change: Reinventing our Economy, ideastream’s
Shula Neuman reports that wherever talks of regionalism are headed
- the more public discussion there is, the better the chances for
success.


If there’s
one thing that Reverend Marvin McMickle believes about Cleveland’s
economy, it’s that the status quo isn’t working.
Marvin
McMickle: It is unacceptable. 45% poverty in the
neighborhood where you and I are talking right now.
That would be the Fairfax neighborhood where McMickle is pastor, at
Antioch Baptist Church. McMickle says there’s no guarantee that
regional cooperation is the answer to reducing that 45% poverty rate,
but at the moment there aren’t any other solutions out there.
Marvin
McMickle: I have no hesitation at
all in initiating a discussion about that. Because I’m convinced
that left in the present situation neither the city nor the county
are going to remain any better off and that there is a real possibility
that if we came together as a county and a city and talk through
the problems we think are going to be there we may both end up being
better off in the long run.
But
McMickle says, those discussions need to include everyone with a
stake in the region: that means suburban, urban and especially minorities.
Otherwise the idea will get a cold reception from many sectors.
Attorney Stanley Tolliver - a long-time opponent of regionalism
- agrees. As it is now, Tolliver says, there’s the appearance
that discussions are going on behind closed doors, which makes him
suspicious that a select few are coming up with a plan for everyone
else to follow. And that, he says, is condescending.
Stanley
Tolliver: In other words, it’s just like we
used to say in old southern folklore: we know what’s good
for ya’all.
Echoing the sentiments of City Council President Frank Jackson, Tolliver
says any regional plan that does not address the city’s problems
with education, homelessness, and unemployment is unacceptable. He
says without minority and city interests included in the discussions,
then those topics will likely be avoided altogether.
Stanley
Tolliver: I think if you are a
broad minded person and not a fist-minded person, you are willing
to discuss anything. But we don’t want it done on somebody
else’s terms.
Tolliver
is also concerned that if the city and county do merge one day,
then the African-American community is bound to lose the political
influence it’s worked so hard to gain.
Stanley
Tolliver: That is
my whole attitude toward this regional government because it dilutes
the political power that blacks have to decide who represents them
in their city.
John
Powell, director of the Kirwin Institute on the Study of Race and
Ethnicity at The Ohio State University, says loss of political clout
is a concern and for that reason he doesn’t advocate a full-blown
governmental merger. But, he says that doesn’t mean that exploring
regional cooperation on a smaller scale is without merit.
John
Powell: You should be able to think about common
cause with the older suburbs and some of the existing newer suburbs
where blacks may not be in the majority. And then out of that you
may build a relationship where you can then do things that you can’t
do right now. So, yes, I’m saying that’s a legitimate
concern but it shouldn’t be a deal breaker to thinking about
regional cooperation and regional planning.
What’s
more, Powell says, pursuing regional solutions could actually strengthen
African American’s influence, since it taps into the power
of middle class blacks who live outside the city and it breaks down
arbitrary boundaries. Under the current system, he says, there are
barriers to such cooperation.
John
Powell: It’s most pernicious and most dysfunctional
when you have small fragmented communities. You go two blocks
and you’re no longer in the city, the property tax you pay
no longer benefits the city, the school district you’re
in is no longer in the city. The current structural arrangement
the current way of doing business simply can’t address those
things. That’s why I’m suggesting you need regional
cooperation to help African Americans, not just in terms of fiscally
but also politically.
Many agree that
pursuing a more regional approach to government is a big leap, but
it can be done. Just look to the city of Louisville, which just
last year merged with Jefferson County. Jerry Abramson, the mayor
of the new Louisville metro area, says it took 40 years of debate
before voters approved the city-county consolidation. But, he says,
it probably wouldn’t have passed without substantial buy-in
from the black community, including the Urban League and the city’s
weekly African-American newspaper.
Jerry
Abramson: Saying better to have a smaller slice of a
growing and vibrant pie than a larger slice of a pie that was
dwindling.
Some in Northeast
Ohio’s African American population are following the same
logic, and are beginning to look at regionalism as potentially beneficial.
But only, as Rev. McMickle points out, if all people from the region’s
communities are included in the discussion. In Cleveland, Shula
Neuman, 90.3.
Resources:
- Kirwin
Institute
Offical website of the Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race
and Ethnicity
|