 |

Highways and Byways
February 4, 2004 @ 6:33 am and 8:20 am on 90.3
When
most people talk about urban sprawl, or the outward migration from
the region’s core, it usually takes on a negative flavor.
However, sprawl is actually a product in part of an efficient transportation
system. As part of Making Change: Reinventing
Our Economy, ideastream’s Shula Neuman reports
on that connection and the costs associated with the region’s
highways and byways.


Randy and Melissa
Schneider recently moved from University Heights - where Randy grew
up and where his family still lives - to Solon.
The Schneiders
have two children: Josh, who’s four years old, and Leah, 18
months. Moving wasn’t an easy decision for the family. Randy
works in mid-town Cleveland and, although Melissa is mostly a stay-at-home
mom these days, she’s also a planner by trade and consults
part time.
Melissa
Schneider: A lot of time people in my profession
look down at the outer lying communities and sprawl.
But it was a choice the Schneiders felt compelled to make. They wanted
a community with an affordable tax structure and one that offered
the option of good public schools. Solon offered both. They were able
to get a 3,300-square foot house for a fraction of what they’d
pay in cities like Beachwood or Shaker Heights. Contrary to the myths
she’s heard about far-flung suburbs, Melissa found Solon to
be just as neighborly as University Heights.
Melissa
Schneider: I thought I was going
to lose some of that being able to walk to a friend’s house
and we still have that, so that makes me happy. I can’t walk
to Heinen’s anymore, and that I’ll miss, but there is
a neighborhood atmosphere in the suburbs.
Solon’s
population has grown roughly 54% since 1980, mostly because of families
like the Schneiders. Randy Schneider says if it weren’t for
Cleveland’s transportation system, suburbs like Solon wouldn’t
have much appeal.
Randy
Schneider: From where I live now for me to go to
a meeting on the west side in the morning, I can be there in 30,
35 minutes. That’s unheard of in any other major city. It
takes a long time to get around in other cities because of the congestion
and traffic patterns. Cleveland fortunately has built a decent system
around it and it makes it accessible to live in the outlying areas.
At the same time that the region’s transportation system is
an asset to Northeast Ohio, the population migration that the highways
facilitate can also be a detriment. David Beach, executive director
of EcoCity Cleveland, says for too long the state has supported policies
that encourage development where it’s least needed: in places
that threaten natural resources and ignore existing assets.
David
Beach: The state is making investments every day
in all kinds of things from highway infrastructure to helping
put sewer lines in, economic development incentives. Those decisions
often influence where development is most likely to occur.
Developers
are drawn to highway exits and sewer lines. Beach says there are
ways to encourage development that can build on existing infrastructure
and that don’t threaten natural resources, but it requires
a change in mentality.
David
Beach: So, if we can get our state
to have more thoughtful planful effort on where they think development
should be promoted, we could target things in more sensible and
cost effective way that will save tax payers money in long run.
Better
state policy would also help on a local level, where the cost of
development is most frequently felt. Medina County commissioner
Steve Hambley says his county has experienced a 23% growth rate
over the past ten years. Such rapid growth strains the county’s
schools, public services and especially the roads. But state funding
for road improvements to accommodate the swollen population doesn’t
meet the region’s needs. It can’t, Hambley says, not
as long as the state continues to distribute revenues from gas taxes
in such an inequitable fashion.
Steve
Hambley: It’s not on a mileage basis, it’s
not on a car basis, it’s not on a population basis. It’s
just straight, “here’s the amount we collect statewide
and we divide by 88.” So no wonder we’re not meeting
our transportation needs.
Larger
counties like Cuyahoga are hit the hardest, Hambley says, which
affects anyone in the region who uses Cuyahoga’s roads. In
fact, all of Ohio is at a disadvantage when it comes to federal
transportation funds. Ohio is a donor state. Because of its lack
of political clout in congress, it receives about 90 cents for every
dollar taken in in gas taxes. Howard Maier, executive director of
the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency, or NOACA, says
that donor designation could change. There are three bills pending
in congress that would overhaul the current federal transportation
rules.
Howard
Maier: One
of them, well the one Congressman LaTourette is promoting, would
bring a whole lot more money back to Ohio than the other two.
But it also means an increase in gasoline taxes in some way.
Maier says even
with new federal funds, the best use of new money may not be to
build more highways. Maier says putting money in transportation
design, bikeways or enhanced commercial zones, could help the quality
of life for everyone in Northeast Ohio. In Cleveland, Shula Neuman,
90.3.
Resources:
|